Discerning Entrepreneurial Judgment as Reflected in Entrepreneurs’ Responses to Feedback

Discerning Entrepreneurial Judgment as Reflected in Entrepreneurs’ Responses to Feedback

An entrepreneur’s judgment is perhaps the most important asset that a start-up company has. As important as entrepreneurial judgment is, it is a difficult characteristic for others to discern and to evaluate. The purpose of this research project is to bring greater insight and clarity to the process of evaluating the judgment capacities of entrepreneurs during this critical stage of the founding of their companies. This project applies the theory of formal axiology as a lens for studying entrepreneurial judgment and decision-making by analyzing how entrepreneurs receive and respond to feedback. An assessment tool known as the Hartman Value Profile (HVP) provides a way to measure the multi-faceted nature of judgment axiologically. Analysis of participants’ HVP scores suggests that HVP scores are capable of revealing meaningful insights for investors, entrepreneurs, and academics. Many of the findings relate to self awareness, with entrepreneurs being more likely to reflect upon feedback rather than deflect it.

The Different Aspects of Personality and Why They Matter

The Different Aspects of Personality and Why They Matter

This white paper takes a look at personality, what it is and isn’t, if it can be measured, and the science behind personality-based assessments. The paper explains the difference between “personality tests” which tend to place a person in a box, by assigning a ‘type’ or identifier, and more focused personality-based assessments, which measure defined components of one’s personality.

Style Insights® 2021 Technical Manual Version 1.0

Style Insights® 2021 Technical Manual Version 1.0

The following TTISI Style Insights Technical Manual Version 1.0 contains information on the history and development of our behavioral assessment, from its beginnings to current implementation. Included are a host of mathematical, statistical, and psychometric analyses used to establish evidence of validity and reliability of this TTISI assessment. The reader interested in all the details is encouraged to read the manual in its entirety. However, if the reader is interested in the final results, one should focus on Section 16, which serve as a summary of what has been presented elsewhere in this work as well as thoughts for future projects and studies. Appendix B, starting on page 176, presents results from our logistic regression approach to O’NET occupational title identification through the Style Insights variables.

Natural Versus Adapted DISC Graphs

Natural Versus Adapted DISC Graphs

TTI SI recently received a request to provide a research-supported rationale for TTI SI’s use of natural and adapted DISC graphs in our reports. This is a good reminder that some things are so obvious to us internally that we fail to provide the outside world with the documentation needed to understand our decisions. The graphic separation of the DISC data is a great example. This paper will not only explain how these two graphs provide crucial differentiating information, it will also point out how a single averaged DISC graph can be very misleading when trying to understand human behavior.

Motivation Insights®: Instrument Validation Manual

Motivation Insights®: Instrument Validation Manual

TTI’s Personal Interests, Attitudes and Values 2 instrument (PIAV2) is anchored in design and development of their prior PIAV instrument. During the late summer of 2002, TTI initiated a review of the reliability of the six scales and the associated items. That assessment utilized a sample of 2136 cases from 43,325 available cases. These data contained 60% males and 40% females. These responses represent a diverse range of those utilizing this instrument. This assessment of the revised instrument is based on 1,130 responses containing 50.5% males and 49.5% females collected during the late summer of 2003 through the TriMetrix distribution system.