In many cases, organization such as the American Psychological Association, provide general guidelines without providing specific guidance. As an example, we discuss the concepts of acceptable levels of reliability coefficients, as measured by the so-called “alpha” coefficients where after several decades there remains a lack of consensus.
To successfully navigate the Industry 4.0 environment (and beyond), organizations will need to integrate four different generations in their workforce and much more. TTI SI assessment data provides the cornerstone article in this 2019 Automation Alley State of Michigan peer-reviewed conference report.
The follow-on article discusses the specifics of the TTI Success Insights approach to addressing the American Psychological Association’s (APA) viewpoints toward and suggestions for measuring critical components of our assessments. The paper focuses on defining and explaining how TTISI is collecting evidence of validity and reliability.
The 2012 technical compendium includes history, reliability and extensive adverse impact data for behaviors, motivators, competencies and The Hartman Value Profile. The strength of the report lies in the fact that it has all of this information in one document. For those wanting the combination of sciences, please know that we plan to maintain this layout as we revise based on the format established in the latest EQ manual.
This paper provides a brief introduction to item response theory, presents a short list of several popular item response theory models, and gives a brief snapshot of the results of the graded response model applied to the TTI Success Insights EQ assessment.
